irrevelient of the reasons why we went but
ive been watching general sir richard dannat and general sir mike jackson at the inquirary today. their opinions are suggesting that the millitary were close to breaking 2005-2007 and the millitary covenant was way out of balance.
it would be very silly of me to have an oppinion on this however whats the publics opinion? whos to blaime? and who is in place to stand up for the forces when too much is being asked off them
ive been watching general sir richard dannat and general sir mike jackson at the inquirary today. their opinions are suggesting that the millitary were close to breaking 2005-2007 and the millitary covenant was way out of balance.
it would be very silly of me to have an oppinion on this however whats the publics opinion? whos to blaime? and who is in place to stand up for the forces when too much is being asked off them
Comment